SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Pat) 394

S.K.CHATTOPADHYAYA
Rash Bihari Singh – Appellant
Versus
Raj Mangal Singh – Respondent


Judgment

S.K.Chattopadhyaya, J.

1. This application under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing the order dated 7.2.88 passed in Criminal Revision No. 28/88.

2. It appears that the Executive Magistrate by his order dated 28.1.88 declared the possession of the petitioner over the disputed land; The opposite parties moved in revision and the First Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad, by the impugned order, set aside the order of the Executive Magistrate declaring the possession of opposite party Nos. 1, 2 and 3 over the disputed land.

3. A preliminary objection has been raised by Mr. M.P. Sinha, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties about the maintainability of this application. Firstly, he submits that the impugned order being revisable under the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner ought not to have filed this quashing application. Secondly, it is contended that against the same order the petitioner earlier moved this Court under Sec. 482 of the Code in Cr. Misc. No. 557/88 (R) which was dismissed as withdrawn on 8.3.88. he submits that the present application should be dismissed on that score alone.

4. Mr. N.K.P. Sinha, le





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top