SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Pat) 446

PATNA HIGH COURT
Bisheshwar Prasad Singh and Naresh Kumar Singh JJ.
Suprabhat Steel Limited
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7467 of 1994 ;
Decided On : AUGUST 9, 1995

A notification issued by the Commercial Taxes Department, which imposed a condition that the facility of sales tax exemption on the purchase of raw material would be available only to old industrial units whose investment on plant and machinery did not exceed Rs.13.00 Crores on 1-4-1993, and who had not availed of any facility/benefit under the earlier incentive Policy, was inconsistent with the Industrial Incentive Policy, 1993, which extended the facility of sales tax exemption to old industrial units without any such condition.

Headnote:

INDUSTRIAL INCENTIVE POLICY - SALES TAX EXEMPTION - OLD INDUSTRIAL UNITS - INTERPRETATION OF POLICY - NOTIFICATION IMPOSING ADDITIONAL CONDITION - VALIDITY - ESTOPPEL.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, old industrial units, challenged the validity of a notification issued by the Commercial Taxes Department, which imposed a condition that the facility of sales tax exemption on the purchase of raw material would be available only to old industrial units whose investment on plant and machinery did not exceed Rs.13.00 Crores on 1-4-1993, and who had not availed of any facility/benefit under the earlier incentive Policy. The petitioners contended that the notification was inconsistent with the Industrial Incentive Policy, 1993, which extended the facility of sales tax exemption to old industrial units without any such condition.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the notification was inconsistent with the Industrial Incentive Policy, 1993, and quashed it to the extent that it imposed the additional condition. The Court held that the policy clearly extended the facility of sales tax exemption to old industrial units fulfilling the condition laid down in the policy, and that the notification could not deprive the old industrial units of the benefits under the policy. The Court also held that the petitioners were entitled to the facility of sales tax exemption on the purchase of raw material under paragraph 10.4 (i) (b) of the Industrial Incentive Policy, 1993.

Issues: Whether the notification imposing the additional condition was consistent with the Industrial Incentive Policy, 1993.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the notification was inconsistent with the Industrial Incentive Policy, 1993, because it imposed a condition that was not warranted by the policy. The Court held that the policy clearly extended the facility of sales tax exemption to old industrial units fulfilling the condition laid down in the policy, and that the notification could not deprive the old industrial units of the benefits under the policy.

Final Decision: The Court allowed the petitions, quashed the notification to the extent that it imposed the additional condition, and declared that the petitioners were entitled to the facility of sales tax exemption on the purchase of raw material under paragraph 10.4 (i) (b) of the Industrial Incentive Policy, 1993.

Judgment

B. P. Singh, J.

1. These three writ petitions involves common questions and have, therefore, been heard together and are being disposed of bv this common judgment. Counsel for the parties are agreed that issues involved are identical and in all the three writ petitions the some question arises for consideration by this Court, namely, whether the petitioners are entitled to the benefit envisaged under peragraph 10 4 (i) (b) of the Industrial Incentive policy 1993, announced by the Government of Bihar and published in the official gazette on 16-7-1993. In other words, the sole question which arises for consideration is whether the petitioner-Units, which were established before 1st April, 1993, with investments on plant and machinery not exceeding rupees 1500 Crores, and had also come into production before that date, are entitled to the benefit of sales tax exemption on the purchase of raw material for a period of seven years from 1-4-1993. The case of the petitioner is that under paragraph 144 (i) (b) the old industrial units referred to are those which answer the description in that sub-paragraph, but regardless of the date on which they went into production. The industrial policy does not lay down any other condition regarding their having taken benefit of any earlier scheme. On the other hand, the learned Advocate General appearing for the state submitted that on a proper appreciation of the said policy it would be apparent that no benefit whatsoever was sought to be extended to such Units which had gone into production before 1st April, 1998, and had taken advantage of the earlier industrial policy It was for this reason that Notification no. SO 95 dated 4-4-1994 and published in the official gazette on the same date was issued by the Commercial Taxes Department laying down a condition that the exemption from payment of tax on purchase of raw materials shall be granted only to those Units which had not availed of any benefit earlier under any industrial policy.

2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the Notification dated 4-4-1994 takes away a small benefit extended to the petitioner-Units, which could not be done unless there was a change of Government policy. The language of paragraph 10 4 (i) (b) is clear and categoric and, therefore, the notification issued on 4-4-1994, to the extent it imposes such a condition must be quashed, as unwarranted and illegal, being contrary to the policy itself,

3. Counsel for the parties have made their submissions by reference to the facts stated in C. W. J. C. No.7063 of 1994; and I shall, therefore, take representative facts from that petition.

4. The petitioner claims that it owns an industrial unit and is included in Annexure-V under item No 46 of the Industrial Incentive Policy, 1993 ; it being an industry dealing with iron and steel, as defined in Sec.14 of the central Sales Tax Act, 1956. It is a medium scale industry manufacturing steel tubes. Its total investment on plant and machinery is less than Rs.15 crores. It had started production prior to 1st April, 1993. The State of bihar with a view to accelerate the growth of industries in the State issued notifications from time to time from the year 1960 extending various benefits by way of incentives to the industries, with the twin objective of development of the State as well as providing employment to the people of the state of bihar. The earlier policy announced by the Government granted total exemption from payment of tax both on purchase of raw materials as well as of finished products. However, in its subsequent policy the Government decided to grant exemption from purchase of raw materials so far as sales tax was concerned, and to give interest-free sales tax loan in lieu of sales tax deposited by the industries. Such provision was made in the industrial policy dated 1st September, 1986 providing both the incentive, namely exemption from payment of tax on purchase of raw materials as well as interest-free sale

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top