SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Pat) 446

NARESH KUMAR SINGH, BISHESHWAR PRASAD SINGH
Suprabhat Steel Limited – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

B. P. Singh, J.

1. These three writ petitions involves common questions and have, therefore, been heard together and are being disposed of bv this common judgment. Counsel for the parties are agreed that issues involved are identical and in all the three writ petitions the some question arises for consideration by this Court, namely, whether the petitioners are entitled to the benefit envisaged under peragraph 10 4 (i) (b) of the Industrial Incentive policy 1993, announced by the Government of Bihar and published in the official gazette on 16-7-1993. In other words, the sole question which arises for consideration is whether the petitioner-Units, which were established before 1st April, 1993, with investments on plant and machinery not exceeding rupees 1500 Crores, and had also come into production before that date, are entitled to the benefit of sales tax exemption on the purchase of raw material for a period of seven years from 1-4-1993. The case of the petitioner is that under paragraph 144 (i) (b) the old industrial units referred to are those which answer the description in that sub-paragraph, but regardless of the date on which they went into production. The industria




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top