SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Pat) 395

N.PANDEY
Asharfi Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

N.Pandey, J.

1. This application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing of the entire prosecution in G.R. No. 1856 of 1979, arising out of Lalganj P.S.Case No.7 dated 10-11-1979, registered under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. It appears on the basis of a written report, submitted before the Officer-in-charge, Lalganj Police Station, a case was registered on 10-11-1979 against one Lagandeo Roy under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently on 2-9-1985 Inspector, Co-operative Police vigilance Cell, Muzaffarpur, filed an application before the Magistrate with a prayer that the name of the petitioner be also added in the column of the accused persons in the First Information Report. The learned Magistrate directed accordingly that the name of the petitioner should be mentioned separately and kept with the First Information Report. Thereafter, it appears from the order-sheet that on 3-7-1986, the final report was submitted before the Court. But unfortunately till 25-4-1995 neither any cognizance was taken nor any order was passed either rejecting or accepting the final report.

3. The defence of the petitioner is of total deni





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top