SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Pat) 351

B.L.YADAV
Anandi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Mahendra Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. This is a defendants second appeal under Sec. 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short the Code) in a suit for declaration that ex parte decree dated 17-2-1961 passed in Partition Suit No. 38 of 1960 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Gaya is illegal and without jurisdiction and also for restraining defendant No. 1 from taking further steps in pursuance of the ex parte decree.

2. The plaintiffs have filed the suit with the averments that there was an earlier suit No. 38 of 1960 filed by the present defendant Smt. Anandi Singh in the Court of Subordinate Judge III, Gaya. Lakshman Singh was also made party to the suit, whereas other sons namely, Mahendra Singh and Upendra Singh (the respondents 1 and 2), who (Illegible) minors, were not parties and a preliminary decree obtained on 17th February, 1961 was illegal and fraudulent.

3. The suit was contested by the defendant appellant refuting the averments made in the plaint and alleging that Sakaldip Singh, was the natural guardian of minors Mahendra Singh and Upendra Singh, who were not made parties to the suit. But as the natural guardian Sakaldip Singh was a party, hence even though minors were not made parties but th













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top