SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Pat) 478

S.K.HOMCHAUDHURI, GURUSHARAN SHARMA
Daniel Oraon – Appellant
Versus
Shamim Ahmad – Respondent


Judgment

S.K.Homchaudhuri, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17th March, 1990, passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 962 of 1984 (R).

2. Undisputed facts in this case are that the land measuring 11.36 acres appertaining to Khata No. 34 of village Changatoli, P.S. Karra, District Ranchi, was recorded in the name of Nabi Munda, father of the appellant and others. The appellant, a member of Scheduled Tribes, made an application under Sec. 71A of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act (hereinafter mentioned as the Act) for restoration of the possession of the said land. The claim of the appellant was resisted by Respondent No. 1, the petitioner in C.W.J.C. No. 962 of 1984 (R), contending, inter-alia, that the holding was sold in Execution Case No. 66R 9 of 1940-41 to Chaugatoli Co-operative Society on 10.3.1941 and the sale was confirmed on 29.8.1941. The Co-operative Society having surrendered the land, landlord settled the same with one Yukub Khan. As Yakub failed to pay the rent, the landlord instituted a suit for recovery of arrear and the holding was sold in Rent Execution Case No. 96 Rule 9 of 1950-51 and respondent No. 1 purchased the said land




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top