SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Pat) 366

PATNA HIGH COURT
P.K.Deb, J.
Maan Kaurand Anisur Rahman
Versus
Rizwanur Rahman
Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 85 of 1979 ; 86 of 1979 ;
Decided On : MAY 24, 1996

A right of easement can be created without a registered document, and the principles of the Easement Act can be applied for equitable relief in cases of obstruction of right of passage.

Headnote:

EASEMENT - RIGHT OF EASEMENT - CREATION - REGISTRATION - NOT REQUIRED - EASEMENT ACT - NOT APPLICABLE IN BIHAR - PRINCIPLES APPLIED FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF - OBSTRUCTION OF RIGHT OF PASSAGE - INJUNCTION GRANTED.

Fact of the Case:

Plaintiff filed a suit for demolition of top projections over windows and closure of openings on the ground and first floors of defendant's building, alleging trespass and nuisance. Defendant claimed permissive possession and easement rights based on an alleged agreement between their predecessors.

Finding of the Court:

Both the trial court and the first appellate court found that the document relied upon by the defendant to establish the agreement was not genuine and that the defendant had failed to prove uninterrupted enjoyment and right of ingress and egress over the passage.

Issues: Whether a right of easement can be created only by a registered document?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. A right of easement can be created without a registered document. 2. The Easement Act is not applicable in Bihar, but its principles are applied for equitable relief in cases of obstruction of right of passage. 3. The defendant failed to prove that they had no access to the main road except through the disputed passage and that they had a right to create obstructions over it.

Final Decision: The second appeals were dismissed, and the decree of the first appellate court was upheld.

Judgment

P.K.Deb, J.

1. Both these appeals are taken up together for disposal as they arise out of the common judgment passed by the Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, in Title Appeal No. 106/1975 and Title Appeal No. 124 of 1975. The plaintiff-respondent No. 1 namely, Bilquin Jamai Begum filed Title Suit No,, 192/21 of 1972/75, before the Subordinate Judge, Ranchi, for a decree for demolition of the top projections over the windows of defendant No. 1s building on the first floor and for closure of all openings on the ground floor and first floor of the defendant No. 1s building on the northern wall and also prayer has been made for perpetual injunction against both the defendants restraining them from tress-passing upon the plaintiffs passage. The suit was contested by both the application who were defendant No. 1 and 2 in the original suit by filling separate written statements. Defendant No, 2 Sardar Darshan Singh is admittedly a tenant in a portion of the building belonging to defendant No. 1 while he is also a tenant in another building just opposite to gate of the plaintiff under the plaintiff.

2. Plaintiffs case is that the acquired two pucca buildings together with some Parti land measuring eighteen (18) Kathas and thirteen (13). Chhataka comprised within northern position of Municipal Survey Plot No 670 bearing Old Municipal holding No. 230 and 231 corresponding to new Municipal holding No. 347, 348 and 349 of Ward No. III of Ranchi Municipality by virtue of a registered deed of gift dated 2.6.49 executed in her favour by her father Seikh Abdul Gafur and came in possession thereof. One of the said buildings stands on the front portion of the land gifted facing the main road of Ranchi Town and the other building towards Hind portion of the land. Towards the southern side of the said building, there is seven and half feet (742 ft.) wide passage running from east on the main road to the Western extremity of the building on She hind portion in order to provide means of access thereto from the main road. That land also forms a part and parcel of the gifted land of the plaintiff and according to the plaintiff, since the date of gift she is in continuous possession thereof by herself and also through her tenant in the buildings, The suit land is a strip of land having a passage like road running north to south in between the said two building joining the south passage as mentioned above. This strip of land in between the two buildings ceased to exist as the plaintiff constructed structure thereon. The windows and doors of the plaintiffs buildings on the hind portion were opened towards the southern passage and on a subsequent date, the plaintiff constructed a building on the south of the said southern passage facing the main road and let out the same to a Tailoring shop. The remaining portion of the southern passage is still in the possession of the plaintiff through her tenants. It has further been contended by the plaintiff that the different No. 2 Sardar Darshan Singh is a tenant of the plaintiff occupying the building on the front side and also of the newly constructed godown which have been separately leased out to defendant No. 2 Defendant No. 1 Anisur Rahman has his building contiguous South of the disputed passage and the northern most wall of the said building stands on the southern side of the plaintiffs passage close to the boundary wall of the plaintiff. According to the plaintiff defendant No. 1 started constructing the first floor of his said building on the old foundation and in course of construction thereof has made eleven openings in the shape of windows on the northern wall of the first floor of the building and has further made top projections (Chhajja) over the said windows to the extent of about two feet of the eight windows over the passage in question.

3. It has further been contended that the defendant No. 1 Rahman has made fresh opening by constructing a door and two windows on the northern m












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top