SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Pat) 439

PATNA HIGH COURT
Asok Kumar Ganguly, J.
Rajesh Kumar Paswan
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5862 of 1996 ;
Decided On : JULY 19, 1996

Headnote:University Laws-Admission-Petitioner declared successful in Post Graduate Medical admission test occupying 20th position in Merit list ill scheduled Caste category candidates when appeared before the appropriate authority for verification of original documents and certificates, the authority concerned rejected petitioners claim for admission on the ground that he is a resident of U.P. and can not get the benefit of pasi caste which is recognised as scheduled caste in U.P. as well as Bihar-Petitioners academic career from schooling to final M.B.B.S. Course through out done in Bihar and he has always been treated as scheduled caste candidate-Decision taken by authorities not to take admission is held erroneous and can not be sustained-Direction issued to the authority to consider the case of the petitioner for admission treating him as belonging to scheduled caste Candidate-1990(3) SCC 130 Dist. (Paras 12 & 13)

Judgment

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In this writ petition some interesting questions of constitutional law arise from the undisputed facts of this case.

3. The petitioners father Sri Ram Komal was originally a resident of Village - Bhaishali Buzurg, P. O. Kanaicha, District Gorakhpur in the State of Uttar Pradesh and he belongs to caste Pasi. The petitioners father while working as Electric Loco Driver of the South Eastern Railways and posted at Tatanagar in the State of Bihar was alloted official quarters at Tatanagar in the month of April, 1979 and since then he has been living there. The petitioner who is the son of the aforesaid Sri Ram Komal did his schooling in St. Mary Hindi High School, Bishtupur and from there he passed S. S. Examination in 1985 in First Division. Thereafter, he did his I. S. C. from Jamshedpur Co-operative College in the examination conducted by the Bihar Intermediate Education Council, Patna through Ranchi University, Ranchi. Thereafter petitioner did his M.B.B.S. course from L. N. Mithila University.

4. The petitioner claims that he belongs to Pasi Community which is a scheduled caste community within the meaning of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Amendment Act, 1950. This also appears from the caste certificate No. 7881 dated 7-6-1985 granted by the concerned authority as well as another caste certificate No. 42 dated 10-4-1996 granted by the Anchaladhikari, Jamshedpur and the Residence Certificate No. 23 dated 11-1-1988 granted by the Deputy Commissioner, Singh bhum (Chaibasa).

5. It is not in dispute that both in the State of Bihar and in Uttar Pradesh the said caste Pasi falls in the category of scheduled caste. The petitioner stated in para 11 of the writ petition that throughout his academic career even upto the stage of his final M.B.B.S. course he has always rightly and validly been treated as a Scheduled Caste candidate. This fact has not been denied in the counter affidavit filed by the respondents.

6. The petitioner thereafter applied for admission for the course of Post Graduate Medical in Medical Colleges of the state of Bihar by obtaining application form and post Graduate Medical Admission Test Prospectus, 1996 and appeared in the test on 14th January, 1996 for the purpose of admission in the said course. His roll number was 5326. The result of the said test was declared in the last week of March, 1996 and the petitioner was declared successful. His position in the merit list shown as 20th in S. C. category candidates. Thereafter the petitioner was required to appear before the appropriate authority for verification of original documents and certificates. The petitioner appeared personally in the Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna along with the original documents and certificates on 26th April, 1996 for counselling and for verification of the aforesaid original documents. The date of counselling was changed from 26th April, 1996 to 4th June, 1996. On that date also the petitioner appeared with the required documents, but the petitioner was shocked and surprised to know that the authority concerned rejected the petitioners claim for admission in Post Graduate Medical course on the ground that he is a resident of U. P. and he cannot be given the benefit of Pasi community which is the scheduled caste community in the State of U. P. As a result of the aforesaid decision being taken by the authority his position in the merit list slided down and the petitioner was denied admission in the medical course though he occupied 20th position in the list among scheduled caste candidate.

7. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents filed a counter affidavit in which the factual position asserted by the writ petitioner in the writ petition has not been denied. The only ground on which counsel for the respondents relied in the course of his argument and in his counter affidavit has been stated in Para-4 which is set out below :-

Para-4 That for the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top