SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Pat) 689

B.P.SHARMA, B.P.SINGH
Ravi Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

B.P.Singh and B.P.Sharma JJ.

1. The petitioner herein is an accused in at least two cases, out of several cases registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation in the State Bihar, numbering about 41, in connection with what is commonly known as Animal Husbandry Scam. It is alleged that large scale illegal withdrawals of huge amounts took place from various treasuries of the Government of Bihar in relation to supply of fodder, medicines etc. to the department of Animal Husbandry and though payments were made, in fact the goods alleged to have been supplied were never supplied. Since the Central Bureau of Investigation (hereinafter referred to as the C.B.I.) has sought remand of the petitioner in at least two of the cases, we proceed on the basis that he is an accused in the two cases in which he has been remanded, though it is premature for us to say whether he is accused in other cases as well which are being investigated by the C.B.I, under the directions of the High Court and the Supreme Court.

2. The first case is Mango P.S. case No. 30 of 1996 which was instituted on 3.2.96 on the basis of a report submitted by the then Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Dr. Gorelal





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top