SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Pat) 835

B.R.SINGH
Annapurna Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

B. P. Singh, J.

1. - These two writ petitions were heard by a Division Bench of this Court. The petitioners in both the writ petitions had challenged the Corrigenda issued by the Bihar State university (Constituent Colleges) Service Commission dated 5th May, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the first Corrigendum), and 23rd May, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the second corrigendum ). These corrigenda related to the advertisement issued by the respondent Commission on 16-12-1989 inviting applications for appointment to eight posts of Principal in the different faculties under the Patna University. The petitioners challenged these two corrigenda on several grounds. The learned Judges, who heard the writ petitions, were agreed that the second corrigendum deserved to be struck down as illegal and invalid, though for different reasons. They, however, differed on the question of validity of the first corrigendum, while Aftab Alam, J. held the same to be invalid and illegal and quashed the same, Astha. na, J. held that the same was in accordance with law and warranted to interference by this Court. On a difference of opinion between two Learned judges of this court, for whom I h






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top