SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Pat) 738

M.Y.EQBAL, LOKNATH PRASAD
New India Assurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Urmila Devi – Respondent


Judgment

M.Y.Eqbal, J.

1. In the instant appeal, filed by appellant New India Assurance Co. Ltd. under Sec. 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , one of the important questions involved for consideration is as to whether the insurance company would be liable to pay compensation in a case where accident did not tale place in a #24;public place#25; within the meaning of Sec. 2(24) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939

2. The brief facts of the case which give rise to the question may briefly be stated for correct appreciation of the question as well as the answer that we propose to give. The deceased was a contractor at Tata Yodogawa Limited, Gamharia (Tayo). While deceased was looking after his contract job in the said Tayo factory a truck bearing No. BHX 7268 which was being driven in negligent manner dashed the deceased at the Tayo factory gate as a result of which the deceased succumbed to injury. The truck belongs to D.D. Transport and was insured with the appellant New India Assurance Co. Ltd. The claimants who were the widow and minor children of the deceased Lai Babu Singh filed application for compensation impleading the owner, the driver and the insurance company as opposite parti



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top