SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Pat) 301

NAGENDRA RAI
N. C. Dhoundial – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Nagendra Rai, J.

1. Both the matters arise out of the complaint case No.260/92 and as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. The petitioners have challenged the order dated 20-9-96 passed in complaint Case No.260/92 by the Judicial magistrate 1st Class, Ranchi issuing process after holding that a prima facie case is made out against them under Sections 147, 148, 342, 427, 506, 380 and 384 I. P. C.

3. On 9-9-92 opposite party No.2, posted at the relevant time as DIG/executive director (Vigilance) Central Coal field Limited (hereinafter referred to as the coal field) filed a petition of complaint against the petitioners of both the cases alleging inter alia that while posted in the aforesaid capacity in the Coal Field he has exposed the illegal and nefarious activities of the Officers of the Coal Field as a result of which he incurred their displeasure and they in connivance with the accused petitioners, who are Superintendent of police, xxxx - Deputy Superintendent of police and Inspectors of C. B. I. /sp. at ranchi, hatched up a conspiracy to dislodge him from the post of D. I. G. Vigilance B. C. C. L. Ltd. , so that there may

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top