LOKNATH PRASAD
Bimlesh Kumar Saraf – Appellant
Versus
Chetana Saraf – Respondent
Loknath Prasad, J.
1. This revision application has been filed by the petitioner who were described as accused in complaint case No. 503/9S filed bv the opposite party No. 1 Smt. Chetna Saraf pending before the Chief judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad.
2. For proper appreciation of this application, it can be said that the aforesaid complaint was filed by the complainant, Chetna who is admittedly the married wife of petitioner No. .1 Bimlesh Kumar Saraf and other petitioners are father, brother and the wife of the brother of the husband-accused. Allegations were levelled by the married wife as against her husband and in-laws that at the time of marriage demand was made by wav of dowry a Maruti car and Rs. 1 lakh in cash besides some ornaments to which the father of the complainant could not comply. However, on pursuasion of others, marriage was solemnised. After the marriage when the complainant was in here matrimonial house at Muzaffarpur, she was occasionally tortured and even assaulted and she was not even provided with proper food and she was neglected awfully even at the time of giving birth to a male child, In-laws including the husband used to torture and subjected her to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.