SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Pat) 3

S.N.JHA
Arvind Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Umapati Devi – Respondent


Judgment

S.N.Jha, J.

1. This Civil Revision is directed against the order by which the court below has refused to stay further proceeding in Title Partition Suit No. 57/95 Relevant facts are as follows.

2. Opposite party No. 1 has filed Title Partition Suit No. 57/95 seeking partition of her share in the properties left behind by one Ram Sewak Rai @ Bhola Rai. The petitioner claims the property on the basis of Will dated 10.11.94 which is said to have been executed by the said Ram Sewak @ Rai Bhola Rai in his favour. He filed a petition for being added as a party, having come to learn about the suit, on 5.2.96 which was allowed; It maybe stared that his mother had been impleaded as sole defendant in the suit. After being added as defendant No. 2, the petitioner filed written statement stating about the aforesaid Will. He also stated that he has filed a Letters of Administration case (L.A. Case No. 111/95) seeking grant of letters of administration with respect to the said Will, which is pending in the court of District Judge, Patna. The plaintiff of the present suit has already appeared and filed objection in that case. An application was filed for stay of the present suit, i.e. TPS











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top