SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Pat) 505

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, N.PANDEY
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Renu Devi – Respondent


Judgment

N.Pandey, J.

1. The appellant (insurer) being aggrieved by an order of the Deputy Commissioner-cum-Commissioner, Workmens Compensation, dated October 27, 1994, passed in C.W.C. No. 9 of 1993 has preferred this appeal under Sec. 30 of the Workmens Compensation Act (in short the Act). By the impugned order, the insurer was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 76,885.20 (Rupees seventy-six thousand] eight hundred and eighty-five and twenty paise) to the claimants as compensation for the death of Rajendra Ojha on account of an accident, which took place in the night of August 16/17, 1991 while he was driving a truck of respondent-employer bearing registration No. WML 2337.

2. It appears when this case was taken up before a learned Single Judge of this Court, a preliminary objection was raised by the respondents on the maintainability of this appeal due to non- compliance of the mandatory requirement of the third proviso of Sub-sec. (1) of Sec. 30 of the Act. It was contended that in; order to maintain this appeal under Sec.30 of the Act, the appellant was required to enclose a certificate by the Commissioner with the memorandum to the effect that he had deposited with him the amount pa

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top