ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, N.PANDEY
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Renu Devi – Respondent
N.Pandey, J.
1. The appellant (insurer) being aggrieved by an order of the Deputy Commissioner-cum-Commissioner, Workmens Compensation, dated October 27, 1994, passed in C.W.C. No. 9 of 1993 has preferred this appeal under Sec. 30 of the Workmens Compensation Act (in short the Act). By the impugned order, the insurer was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 76,885.20 (Rupees seventy-six thousand] eight hundred and eighty-five and twenty paise) to the claimants as compensation for the death of Rajendra Ojha on account of an accident, which took place in the night of August 16/17, 1991 while he was driving a truck of respondent-employer bearing registration No. WML 2337.
2. It appears when this case was taken up before a learned Single Judge of this Court, a preliminary objection was raised by the respondents on the maintainability of this appeal due to non- compliance of the mandatory requirement of the third proviso of Sub-sec. (1) of Sec. 30 of the Act. It was contended that in; order to maintain this appeal under Sec.30 of the Act, the appellant was required to enclose a certificate by the Commissioner with the memorandum to the effect that he had deposited with him the amount pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.