SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Pat) 215

M.Y.EQBAL
Bhagwati Prasad Jalan – Appellant
Versus
Prem Lata Devi Kedia – Respondent


Judgment

M.Y.Eqbal, J.

1. The important question involved in this civil revision application is whether the plaintiff seeking a decree fro specific performance of contract would be entitled to amend the plaint by inserting an alternative relief of refund of money even at the stage where such relief become barred by limitation.

2. The plaintiff-petitioner filed Title Suit No. 101 of 1992 in the court of the subordinate Judge, Ranchi, against the opposite parties claiming a decree for specific performance of contract and for a direction to the opposite parties to execute and register the sale deed in his favour. The said suit was instituted by filing a plaint on 5.2.1992. According to the plaintiff, one Ghisu Lal Jain acting as an agent and broker on behalf of Ram Narain Kedia, father-in-law of defendant No. 1, entered into an agreement for sale of 4 Kathas of land out of Municipal Survey Plot No. 1598 for a sum of Rs. 16, 000.00 and on receipt of Rs. 5, 000.00 as advance on 14.1.1980 besides Rs. 5, 000.00 as commission. On 19.5.1981, the defendant No. 1 executed an agreement in favour of the plaintiff on the death of his father in respect of 4 kathas of land out of M.S. Plot No. 1598


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top