PATNA HIGH COURT
Loknath Prasad, J.
Somai Deogam
Versus
State Of Bihar
Criminal Appeal No. 89 of 1993 ;
Decided On : OCTOBER 27, 1997
Sec. 377 - Rape and Sodomy - Sec. 377 of the I.P.C. - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the prosecution's case under Secs. 376/377 of the I.P.C., focusing on the allegations of rape and sodomy. The medical report and evidence of the victim girl supported the allegation of sodomy, leading to the conviction under Sec. 377 of the I.P.C.
Fact of the Case:
The victim girl was allegedly raped and sodomized by the appellant, leading to his conviction under Sec. 377 of the I.P.C. The appellant denied the charges, claiming false implication due to enmity and innocence.
Finding of the Court:
The trial court found the appellant guilty of sodomy under Sec. 377 of the I.P.C. and acquitted him of the rape charges under Sec. 376 of the I.P.C. The court rejected the appellant's defense of false implication and age-related plea.
Issues: The key issues revolved around the credibility of the victim's testimony, the medical evidence, and the appellant's defense of false implication and age-related plea.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the victim's testimony, medical report, and corroborating evidence to convict the appellant under Sec. 377 of the I.P.C. while rejecting the defense's claims of false implication and age-related plea.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence under Sec. 377 of the I.P.C. were confirmed and maintained. The appellant's bail bond was cancelled, and he was directed to surrender to serve the remaining part of his sentence.
Loknath Prasad, J.
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 30.4.93 passed by 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Singhbhum West at Chaibasa in S.T. No. 374/91 thereby and thereunder the sole appellant was found guilty under Sec. 377 of the I.P.C. and he was convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for five years.
2. The prosecution case in short is that the victim girl Sarsawti Icha Gutto of village Bhoya, P.S. Sadar at about 6.30 P.M. or so after purchasing rice beer (Haria) from the local shop of the village and when she was returning in her residence then on the way the appellant asked her to come immediately after keeping the rice beer in the house as he had got some urgent work with her. The victim girl after keeping the rice beer in the house came to the appellant and enquired about the work then the appellant apprehended her and put a bed sheet which he was holding and took her near a lonely place in the village near railway line and got the victim girl naked and committed rape and after that in that very place sodomy was committed causing injury and bleeding. After commission of sodomy the appellant brought the girl near the village and threatened her not to disclose this fact to any body. However, when the victim girl came to her residence and interrogated by her mother then she disclosed everything and this matter was also disclosed to some relations. On the next morning the appellant was apprehended by the villagers and the village Mukhiya and Munda and the victim girl alongwith her relations and the apprehended accused had gone to P.S. where she lodged the F.I.R. on the next date of occurence at about 2.30 P.M. and on that basis this case was instituted against the appellant under Secs. 376/377 of the I.P.C.
3. After the institution of the case the victim girl was referred to doctor for medical examination and after completing of the investigation charge-sheet was submitted as against the appellant.
4. In the trial court appellant claimed himself innocent and denied to have committed rape or sodomy and two fold defence was made out in the court below. Firstly that he was trapped in this case only for the reason that the parents of the victim girl wanted to marry her girl with him and secondly defence was taken that as the cousin brother of the victim girl had some enmity with the appellant he had been falsely implicated by concocting a case of rape and sodomy. The trial court believed the prosecution story so far as allegation of sodomy is concerned and convicted him in the manner indicated above. But recorded a finding of acquittal so far as allegation of rape under Sec. 376 of the I.P.C. is concerned. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the order of the court below this appeal had been preferred challenging the finding of the court below on various grounds.
5. According to the prosecution case this occurrence took place in the late evening of 7.1.91 in village Bhoya and admittedly the victim girl Sarsawti Icha Gutto was found aged only 15 years or so by the doctor also and the appellant is man of the same village and the house of the appellant is near the house of the victim girl and they are known to each other from before as this occurence of sodomy was committed in a lonely place, naturally the victim girl, Saraswati, who has figured as P.W. 3 is the sole witness of the occurence. According to this witness on the relevant day of Monday he had gone to bring Haria from the local shop and at about 6.30 P.M. or so when she was returning with purchased Haria then the appellant met her on the way and asked her to come for some work after keeping the Haria. Accordingly it is also her evidence that when she again came and enquired about the work she was apprehended and a bed sheet was wrapped on her and she was forcibly taken to a lonely place near railway line where on the same bed sheet she was made to lie down and first of all rape was committed causing bleeding and immediately at that very time sod
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.