SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Pat) 776

B.P.SHARMA, BISHESHWAR PRASAD SINGH
Abhay Prakash Sahay Lalan – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of Judicature At Patna Through Its Registrar General – Respondent


Judgment

B.P.SINGH, J.

1. The petitioner herein is an advocate practising before this Court. He has filed the instant petition in public interest with a view to preventing the deteriorating standard of the legal profession in the interest of proper administration of justice as also to maintain the dignity and decorum of the legal profession. He has prayed that this Court should issue an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the High Court to make rules under S. 34 of the Advocates Act, 1961 , laying down the conditions subject to which an advocate may be permitted to practise in the High Court and in the Courts subordinate thereto. In sum and substance his grievance is that entry into the legal profession with a right to practise before the High Court or Courts subordinate thereto on the mere strength of a law degree and enrolment by the State Bar Council is not sufficient to maintain the high standard which the legal profession is expected to maintain. This consequently results in seriously impairing the administration of justice since the legal profession is an intrinsic part of the justice delivery system in this country.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the legal













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top