SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Pat) 620

GURUSHARAN SHARMA
Vidya Devi – Appellant
Versus
Kausalya Devi – Respondent


Judgment

Gurusharan Sharma, J.

1. Murat Mahto of village Chaakwai, Tola Baghi at present within Nawadah district, died leaving his three sons, Meghan Mahto, Baijnath Mahto, the defendant No. 1 and Nanhku Mahto, the original plaintiff.Baijnath Mahto got two sons, namely, Devi Prasad, the defendant No. , 9, who was given in adoption to one Daroga Mahto of village Amar Singh Bigha and Nand Prasad Nand Kishore Prasad, the defendant No. 2, Meghan Mahto left behind two sons, Harslal Mahto and Ramjee Mahto. Lakhan Mahto son of Harslal Mahto died leaving behind his widow, Kaushalya Devi, the original defendant No. 3 and two sons, Vijay Mahto and Mukhlal Mahto, the original defendants and 5, Ramjee Mahto died leaving behind his widow,Lakshmi Devi the original defendant No. 6 and two sons, Awadhesh Mahto and Dinesh Mahto, the original defendants 7 and 8.

2. On 14.11.1972 Nanhku Mahto filed Title (Partition) Suit No. 266 of 1972 in the Court of the Second Subordinate judge, Gaya for partition of his 1/3rd share in the joint family property detailed in schedule A to the plaint.

3. During the pendency of the suit, on 21.2.1973 Nanhku Mahto executed a registered deed of gift (Ext.5) in favour of




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top