SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Pat) 334

LOKNATH PRASAD
Sheojee Singh – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bokaro Steel City – Respondent


Judgment

Loknath Prasad, J.

1. In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 8.2.1983 (Annexure 4) recorded by Respondent No.1 in B.S.E. Case No. 15/76 whereby and whereunder the complaint case filed under Bihar Shops Establishment Act, 1954 by the petitioner was dismissed and his dismissal order recorded by the Bank authority was duly confirmed.

2. According to the petitioner, he was employed as clerk-cum-typist in Dhanbad branch of State Bank of India and he was also confirmed in the post of typist. It has been alleged that on 8.4.1974 in the Dhanbad branch of State Bank of India, one Badri Ram holder of Cheque No. 827709 for Rs. 6502.66 ps. drawn by the Executive Engineer, Works Division Dhanbad presented it for payment at the Govt. Counter and after due verification he was given token No. 471. However, Respondent No. 2 made an allegation that the petitioner somehow or other opened token No. 431 and in course of transmission of the cheque fraudulently altered the number of the token on the aforesaid cheque from 471 to 431 and obtained the payment on the strength of token No. 431 through some person and the petitioner has shown undue interest in












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top