SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Pat) 411

B.P.SINGH, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
Jitendra Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Tata Engineering And Locomotive Company Limited – Respondent


Judgment

A.K.Ganguly, J.

1. These two Letters Patent Appeals are directed against a judgment dated April 28, 1995 passed by a learned single Judge of this : Court in C.W.J.C. No. 911 of 1990 (R) whereby the Award dated January 29, 1990 passed by the Labour Court, Jamshedpur was quashed.

2. L.P.A. No. 244 of 1995 (R) was filed by the Workman in whose favour the Award was passed. L.P.A. No. 246 of 1995 (R) was filed by M/s. Tata Engineering & Locomotive Company (hereinafter called the said Company) in respect of certain directions of the learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment about payment of salary to the appellant/workman from the date of dismissal till the date of judgment and an additional sum of Rs. 50,000. Both the appeals were heard together as both were directed against the same judgment of the learned Single Judge noted above.

3. The genesis of the factual aspects of this case is noted below:

On April 14, 1985, which was a Sunday, a General Body meeting of TELCO Co-operative Society (hereinafter called the. said Society) was held in the new canteen hall. The said meeting was held as per the bye-laws of the said Society and the issue of bifurcation of the said Society c




































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top