SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Pat) 281

R.A.SHARMA, A.K.PRASAD, LOKNATH PRASAD
Rasan Trigun Barla – Appellant
Versus
Rilan Sandhya Toppno – Respondent


Judgment

R.A.Sharma, J.

1. The plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit u/s. 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (hereinafter referred to as the Act)for dissolution of his marriage with defendant No. 1 on the ground of adultery. The alleged adulterer was impleaded as defendant No. 2. In the suit notice were issued to the defendant, who appeared and prayed for time for filing written statement. But thereafter they remained absent, resulting in ex parte judgment dissolving the marriage of the plaintiff with defendant No. 1. The ex parte judgment was recalled on the application of defendant No. 1 under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Thereafter written statement was filed. On 15.10.1996 a joint application was filed by both the parties, i.e. husband and wife, in the Court below seeking dissolution of marriage and for passing consent decree of divorce. The Court below after hearing the parties decreed the suit in terns of the compromise. On 18.11.1996 the decree for dissolution of marriage was prepared. The said decree has been sent for confirmation under Secs. 17 and 20 of the Act to this Court.

2. After receipt of the records from the Court below for confirmation, notices we


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top