SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Pat) 386

M.Y.EQBAL
Radha Devi – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar Sinha – Respondent


Judgment

M.Y.Eqbal, J.

1. This Revision application has been filed by the defendants-tenants under Sec. 14(8) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) against the judgment and decree dated 30.7.1997 passed by Munsif, I, Begusarai in Title Suit No. 9 of 1992. By the said judgment and decree, the aforesaid suit filed by the plaintiff has been decreed on the ground of personal necessity.

2. The facts of the case are as follows. The plaintiff-opposite party filed the aforesaid suit for eviction of the defendants from the suit premises, which is a land and house comprised within the survey plot No. 652 under Khata No. 152 situated at Begusarai. The plaintiff said to have purchased the said plot along with other Khesra which is compact block having residential house thereon. The plaintiffs case is that the defendant is a tenant in respect of the house standing on a portion of the aforesaid plot on monthly rent of Rs. 400.00 . The plaintiff several times demanded rent but the, defendant never paid the same to the plaintiff. The plaintiff alleged that he requires the suit premises for his own use and occupation as he wants t





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top