1. This L.P.A. is directed against the order dated 23.4.1998. Shri Rajendra Prasad Singh appears on behalf of the appellants and Junior Counsel to Standing Counsel No. 7 Shri Praveen Kumar appears on behalf of the State. Since the point involved in this L.PA. is short, therefore, with the consent of counsel for the parties, this L.PA. is being disposed of finally.

2. The point involved in this appeal is that if by one notification several persons are affected and jointly that notification is challenged, whether separate sets of Court fees are required to challenge that notification or one set of Court fee would be in accordance with the law.

3. The learned Judge by the impugned order dated 23.4.1998 has reached to the conclusion that though by the notification all the petitioners are affected but there is difference between common interest and similar interest The interests among the petitioners are common or joint when they claim an interest as class or group. In that case only one set of Court fee is payable. But when the interest is not common but similar in the sense that each of the petitioners has suffered individual injury as a result of the impugned order, then in t