SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 466

S.K.KATRIAR
Maithili Sharan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S.K.Katriar, J.

1. Heard Mr. V. Shrinath and Ms. Anita Sinha, learned Advocates for the petitioner, and Mr. Amreshwar Sahay, learned G.A., for the respondents.

2. The writ petitioner by this writ petition prays for quashing of that portion of the order as contained in notification contained in memo No. 311(11) health, dated 30-6-98 (Annexure-3), insofar as it relates to the petitioner whereby he has been transferred as the Tutor at Patliputra Medical College, Dhanbad, and for a further writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus calling upon respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to give to the petitioner and re-designate him as Assistant Professor of Micro-biology, and for a further writ/order/direction for quashing that portion of the notification contained in memo No. 886 (17) (health), dated 17-8-98 (Annexure-2), whereby the petitioner is sought to be put under suspension for allegedly violating the aforesaid order of transfer dated 30-6-98 (Annexure-3).

3. According to the petitioner, he is at present as Tutor in the cadre of Bihar Medical Education Service who was posted as such in the Department of Micro-biology, Ranchi Medical College Hospital, Ranchi, and has by the impugned or










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top