SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 1325

PATNA HIGH COURT
B.P.Singh and S.K.Chattopadhyaya JJ.
Awadhesh Kumar Singh
Versus
Union Of India
Letter Patent Appeal No. 47 of 1999 ;
Decided On : DECEMBER 14, 1999

A fresh cause of action can arise for a party if their representation is rejected, even if they had earlier withdrawn a writ petition related to the same matter.

Headnote:

Withdrawal of Writ Petition - Fresh Cause of Action - The court held that the appellant had a fresh cause of action on dismissal of his representation, and his earlier withdrawal of the writ petition did not debar him from moving the Court afresh after the rejection of the representation filed by him pursuant to the direction of the Court.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant's writ petition was dismissed by a learned Judge of the Court on the ground that the appellant had earlier withdrawn a similar petition without liberty to agitate his grievance afresh.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the appellant had a fresh cause of action on dismissal of his representation and his earlier withdrawal of the writ petition did not debar him from moving the Court afresh after the rejection of the representation.

Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant's earlier withdrawal of the writ petition debarred him from moving the Court afresh after the rejection of his representation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the earlier order and held that the appellant was permitted to withdraw the writ petition to file a representation before the competent authority, and the rejection of the representation gave him a fresh cause of action.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to be placed for admission before the appropriate Bench.

Judgment

1. Heard counsel for the parties. The writ petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed by a learned Judge of this Court on the ground that the appellant had earlier moved this Court against the order of his termination in C.W.J.C. No. 8989 of 1996 and had withdrawn the same. The learned Judge has held that since no liberty was granted to the appellant to agitate his grievance afresh in this Court, the writ petition was not maintainable.

2. We have perused the order of this Court dated 17.1.1997 in C.W.J.C. No. 8989 of 1996, which is Annexure-11 to the writ petition. On a plain reading of the said order it is quite clear to us that the appellant was permitted to withdraw the writ petition so to enable him to file a representation before the competent authority in respect of the grievances made by him. The Court further directed that if such an application was filed, the same shall be disposed of without unnecessary dealy. The Court made it clear that it was not expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, as it was for the concerned authority to examine the same and dispose it of in accordance with law.

3. On a plain reading of the aforesaid order it is clear that though the writ petition was permitted to be withdrawn, liberty was reserved for the appellant to move the competent authority which was directed to dispose of the same in accordance with law. The appellant moved the instant writ petition, from which this appeal arises, after the competent authority rejected his representation, making a grievance that the representation was wrongly rejected. In our view, the appellant, got a fresh cause of action on dismissal of his representation and his earlier withdrawal of the writ petition will not debar him from moving this Court afresh after the rejection of the representation filed by him pursuant to the direction of this Court.

4. We, therefore, allow this appeal, set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to be placed for admission before the appropriate Bench.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top