SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 346

GURUSHARAN SHARMA
Nirmal Prasad Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Kapildeo Prasad – Respondent


Judgment

Gurusharan Sharma, J.

1. Title Eviction Suit No.28 of 1995 has been filed by the plaintiff-opposite party against the defendants-petitioners for eviction from part of the Suit Holding No. 86/72, situated in Patna City, under Sec. 14 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. The defendants filed written statement and counter-claims as a cross-suit. It was prayed that eviction suit may be dismissed and it be declared that the plaintiff did not acquire right, title, interest and possession over the suit premises by sale-deed dated 16.9.1991 and as such he was not the landlord of the defendants. The defendants have right, title, interest and possession over the suit premises as well as properties mentioned in Schedule A to the cross-suit.

3. On 28.11.1995, the plaintiff filed a petition under Order VIII, Rule 6C of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) for excluding the counter-claims made by the defendants in their written statement on the ground that it was suit for eviction in respect of the premises, detailed in Schedule II to the plaint under Sec. 11(1)(c) of the Act, whereas count














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top