SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 1103

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Mahavir Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S.J.Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. The case relates to payment of arrears of salary on promotion from retrospective date. The petitioner, who started his career as writer constable on 18.3.1964, was promoted as A.S.I. Police in 1968. His promotion to the post of Sub-Inspector of Police was due since 1979 but his case remained pending and subsequently granted such promotion from retrospective date. Initially, he was provisionally promoted as Sub-Inspector of Police w.e.f. 1.6.1988 and subsequently from further retrospective date of 1.12.1979 granted vide order dated 8.2.1997. The arrears of salary having not granted on such retrospective promotion, the writ petition was preferred.

2. The respondents opposed the writ petition on the ground that there is bar of promotion from retrospective date under rule 58 of Bihar Service Code and rule 74 of Bihar Financial Rules. Reliance was placed on (unreported) decision of this court in the case of Ramakant Singh and others V/s. State of Bihar & ors in C.W.J.C. no. 11130/98, disposed of on 13.5.1999. Plea has been taken that the petitioner having not performed the duty of higher post of sub-Inspector of Police since 1979, is not entitled for arre











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top