PATNA HIGH COURT
S.N.Jha, J.
Dhrub Lochan Pradhan
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9062 of 1998 ;
Decided On : NOVEMBER 02, 1999
BIHAR NON-GOVERNMENT SECONDARY SCHOOLS (TAKING OVER OF MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL) ACT, 1980 - SECTION 4(2) - RECOGNITION OF TEACHERS AS HEADMASTERS - CRITERIA AND PROCEDURE - CUT-OFF DATE FOR CALCULATING TEACHING EXPERIENCE - INTERPRETATION OF CIRCULAR NOS. 510 AND 511 DATED 20.11.81 - EFFECT OF SUPREME COURT ORDER IN A.K. PRADHAN V/S. STATE OF BIHAR ON EARLIER DECISIONS OF PATNA HIGH COURT.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, claiming to have been appointed as Headmaster of a school in 1972, sought recognition as Headmaster after the school was taken over by the State Government under the Bihar Non-Government Secondary Schools (Taking over of Management and Control) Act, 1980. He relied on Circulars Nos. 510 and 511 dated 20.11.81, which laid down criteria and procedure for recognition of teachers as Headmasters in taken over schools.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the petitioner's claim was squarely covered by the law laid down by the Patna High Court in Phulena Prasad Yadav V/s. State of Bihar, which held that the cut-off date for calculating teaching experience for recognition as Headmaster was 2.10.1980, the date on which the Take Over Ordinance came into force.
Issues: 1. Whether the petitioner met the criteria and procedure for recognition as Headmaster as per Circulars Nos. 510 and 511 dated 20.11.81? 2. Whether the Supreme Court order in A.K. Pradhan V/s. State of Bihar overruled the earlier decisions of the Patna High Court on the issue of recognition of teachers as Headmasters?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted Circulars Nos. 510 and 511 to hold that the cut-off date for calculating teaching experience for recognition as Headmaster was 2.10.1980, the date on which the Take Over Ordinance came into force. 2. The court held that the Supreme Court order in A.K. Pradhan V/s. State of Bihar was an order under Article 142 of the Constitution and not a binding precedent under Article 141, and therefore, it did not overrule the earlier decisions of the Patna High Court on the issue of recognition of teachers as Headmasters.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner's claim was barred by the principle of finality as three previous writ petitions had failed to obtain a favorable order and the Director, Secondary Education, had also decided the claim in 1993.
1. The petitioner seeks direction to the respondents to recognize him as Headmaster of High School, Kuchai, District West Singhbhum. The relevant facts are as follows :
2. The school in question was granted permission to establish by the then Bihar Secondary Education Board on 3.2.76. The petitioner claims to have been appointed as Headmaster of the school on 1.1.72 itself. On 17.10.79 the school was granted permanent recognition by the Board. Later the school was taken over under the Bihar Non-Government Secondary Schools (Taking over of Management and Control) Ordinance, 1980 (later replaced by Act) with offect from 2.10.80. Three writ petitions one after the other, were filed by the petitioner being CWJC Nos. 3236/85, 11/88 and 3072/93(R). Copies of the orders passed in the first two cases have not been brought on record but from the order passed in the third case dated 5.10.93, it appears that the petitioner was asked to make representation before the Director, Secondary Education. On 31.10.93 the Director, Secondary Education passed an order to the effect that the petitioner shall be treated as Assistant Teacher. From Annexure-1, it appears that the petitioner was transferred from High School, Kuchai to High School, Jawalkanta, District East Singhbhum.
3. Notwithstanding that three attempts to get a favourable order from this Court failed in the aforesaid writ petitions, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition on the strength of a recent order of the Supreme Court in the case of A.K. Pradhan V/s. State of Bihar, 1998(2) PLJR 2 (S.C.). It appears that a similar contention was raised before this Court in the case of Ram Balak Prasad Singh V/s. State of Bihar which was rejected by a reasoned order vide 1998(3) PLJR 255. It has been held that the order in the case of A.K Pradhan (supra) does not lay down any principle of law and therefore, has no binding effect.
4. Before I advert to the case of A.K. Pradhan, it would be appropriate to mention that the petitioner claims his rights in terms of Circular Nos. 510 and 511 dated 20.11.81. The said circulars, which have been held by a Division Bench of this Court to be law on the subject, lay down the criteria and the procedure for recognition of teachers as Headmasters in the taken over schools. It inter alia, provides that person who possesses certain years of teaching experience of recognised school, alone can be recognised as Headmaster. Dealing with the question as to the cut-off date with reference to which such teaching experience is to be reckoned, a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Phulena Prasad Yadav V/s. State of Bihar, 1991(2) PLJR 449 has observed;
"It is true that unlike circular no. 511, there is no specific mention as to on which date this ten years teaching experience is to be, calculated. But having regard to the fact that the said circular the post of Headmaster by promotion from amongst the eligible assistant teacher of the school in question, treating the school as a suit in cases where the vacancy had occurred prior to 2.10.1980, it would be clear that the cut off date for the purpose of calculating the teaching experience has to be 2.10.1980 and no other date. A bare perusal of the first part of the said circular, which has been extracted above, would show that in respect of vacancies on the post of Headmaster of taken over High Schools two categories have been carved out. In the first category are such schools in which the post of Headmaster fell vacant before 2.10.1980 and in the second category are such schools where the posts fell vacant on or after 2.10.1980. In cases falling in the first category, the schools were to be treated as separate unit for the purpose of filling up the post of Headmaster, the idea being that the status quo ante prevailing prior to 2.10.1980 was to be maintained, The Bihar Non- Government Secondary Schools (Taking over of Management and Control) Ordinance, 1980 came into force with effect from 2.10
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.