SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 1163

NARAYAN ROY
Chandan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Narayan Roy, J.

1. Heard Counsel for the parties.

2. This application has been filed by the petitioner for quashing order dated 21-2-1995 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dumka, in case No. 38 of 1995 whereby and where under the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offence under Sec. 420 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

3. The short facts giving rise to this application are as follows:

A petition of complaint was filed by the opposite party No. 2 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dumka, on 21-21995 stating therein that the accused/petitioner had purchased two tyres on credit from M/ s. Dilip Motors, on 5-11-1993 amounting to Rs. 13,398.00 . Thereafter, the accused - petitioner fraudulently issued a cheque on 5-51994 amounting to Rs. 13,398.00 in the name of State Bank of India. Dumka Bazar Branch, in favour of M/ s. Dilip Motors. The said cheque was presented - the Bank and the same was returned with an objection note "insufficient fund" in the account of the accused". The complainant, accordingly issued notice to the accused on 20-12-1994 in terms of sub - section (b) o




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top