SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 882

RADHA MOHAN PRASAD
Kameshwar Jha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petitioner is that the Respondents have wrongly denied his pension from the due date. Respondents have calculated pensionary benefits on the basis of salary drawn by the petitioner on 1.5.1973 and his service for the subsequent period till he attained the superannuation on 31.1.1984 has not been taken into account for the purpose of pensionary benefits.

2. In short, relevant facts are that the petitioner was in service of the State Government as Compounder/Dresser. The petitioner on transfer from Simri Centre, Birpur joined at Salakhua on 23rd May, 1970. In the year 1972 his land and house properties were damaged because of the flood in Koshi river and under such circumstances he went on leave. When he did not return, a show cause notice vide letter dated 1.5.1973 (Annexure-3) was issued to him for his above unauthorised absence and further directing him to return to his work within three days, on failure of which strong departmental action would be taken against him. According to the petitioner, he reported for duty on 24.8.1981, but the same was not accepted by the Civil Surgeon, Saharsa, and the matter was referred to the G




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top