SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 1030

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Sidheshwar Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S.J.Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. The petitioner while prayed for direction on the Respondents not to treat the period from 22nd December 98 to 16th March 98, as on leave, made further prayer to direct them to pay the full salary of the aforesaid period. Prayer has also been made to direct the Respondents to revise his salary, increment of the intervening period and to pay the arrears and current salary. Prayer for time bound promotion has also been made.

2. It appears that while, in service, the petitioner was transferred and for noncompliance of such order of transfer, he was proceeded in departmental proceeding.

The charge sheet was issued on 20th April85, whereinafter, after enquiry his service was terminated from retrospective date of 17th March 82, vide an order dated 21st December 89. The appeal preferred by petitioner was rejected with minor modification vide order dated 20th April91 and the order of termination was given effect from prospective date (21st December89).

3. The petitioner at that stage moved before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 4546/91 and challenged the order of punishment. This Court on hearing the parties, vide judgment and order dated 19th February96 remitted












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top