SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 185

A.N.TRIVEDI, B.P.SINGH
Kunj Bihari Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. These two Appeals arise out of the judgment and order of the 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram dated 1/22.6.1992. The Appellants in Cr. Appeal No. 288 of 1992 are Kunj Bihari Singh, Anil Singh and Bikash Singh while the Appellants in Cr. Appeal No. 294 of 1992 are Rajendra Singh And Nagendra Singh. Appellants Rajendra Singh and Nagendra Singh have been found guilty of the offence under Sec. 302, I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000.00 each and in default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years. They have also been found guilty of the offence under Sec. 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years each.

2. Appellants Anil Singh and Kunj Bihari Singh have been convicted under Section 302/34, I.P.C. and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 2,000.00 each and in default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years each. They have also been found guilty of the offence under Sec. 307/34, I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six years each and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000.00 each and i

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top