SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 986

PATNA HIGH COURT
S.J.Mukhopadhaya, J.
Radhe Shyam Singh
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6847 of 1999 ;
Decided On : AUGUST 11, 2000

The date of birth in the service record should be corrected based on the matriculation certificate if the candidate passed the matriculation examination prior to appointment.

Headnote:

Date of Birth - Correction of Date of Birth - The court remits the case to the Respondents for reconsideration and directs them to correct the date of birth in the service record based on the matriculation certificate if the petitioner passed the matriculation examination prior to appointment.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner seeks correction of date of birth in line with the matriculation certificate, claiming that the date of birth recorded in the service book is different from the one in the matriculation examination.

Finding of the Court:

The court remits the case to the Respondents for reconsideration and directs them to correct the date of birth in the service record based on the matriculation certificate if the petitioner passed the matriculation examination prior to appointment.

Issues: Correction of date of birth, discrepancy between date of birth in service record and matriculation certificate.

Ratio Decidendi: If the candidate has passed the matriculation examination prior to appointment, the date of birth should be corrected on the basis of the matriculation certificate.

Final Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of with the observation and directions to the Respondents to reconsider and correct the date of birth in the service record based on the matriculation certificate if the petitioner passed the matriculation examination prior to appointment.

Judgment

1. This application has been preferred by the petitioner for correction of date of birth, in terms with the matriculation certificate.

2. From the pleading made by the petitioner and the enclosures attached to the writ petition, it will be evident that the petitioner was appointed as Sepoy in B.M.P 8 on 16th April, 1964. His service Book was opened and date of birth was recorded as 1st July, 1942.

3. According to the petitioner, in the matriculation examination, his date of birth has been shown to be 15th January, 1945 and thereby the date of birth should have been corrected accordingly.

4. According to the counsel for the State, the petitioner never informed that he has passed matriculation examination nor the certificate was produced before Selection Board, whereinafter the date of birth was entered in the service record.

5. Further, according to him, the date of birth of petitioner in the service book cannot be corrected, as a period of more than ten years has passed after its posting in the Service Book.

6. In connection with number of cases, it has come to the notice of the Court that the State Govt. issued guidielines in 1976, wherein it was stipulated to correct the date of birth on the basis of matriculation certificate. In one or other case, including the case of Ram Sobhit Rai V/s. State of Bihar, reproted in 1989 BBCJ 141, this Court held that if the candidate has passed the matriculation examination prior to appointment then in that case, the date of birth should be corrected on the basis of matriculation certificate.

7. In the present case, as the petitioner states that he has passed the matriculation examination prior to appointment in 1962, I feel that the matter requires reconsideration by the Respondents.

8. Accordingly, I remit the case to the Respondents before whom the petitioner will produce the original matriculation certificate. If it is found that the petitioner has passed the matriculation examination prior to his appointment, they will correct the date of birth, in the service record, if there is any difference, on the basis of date of birth, as recorded in the matriculation certificate, i.e. 15th January, 1945.

9. A decision, in this respect, be taken and communicated to the petitioner within three months from the date of appearance, when the petitioner will file a representation and produce the original copy of the matriculation certificate.

10. The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and directions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top