SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 904

M.Y.EQBAL, RAVI S.DHAVAN
Subhash Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. ORDER :-

In this writ application filed under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner claimed himself to be under illegal detention and prayed for his release from the jail custody in connection with Sessions Trial No. 124/2000 arising out of Gambaria P.S. Case No. 31/99 pending in the Court of Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa.

2 The petitioners case is that he was for the first time remanded to jail custody by order dated 6-7-99 and thereafter there is no order of remand and the petitioner remanded in jail custody without any valid order of remand. It is contended that even on the date of commitment i.e. on 9-5-2000 no order was passed remanding the petitioner to jail until conclusion of the trial as required under S. 209 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

3. Mr. K. M. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the custody of the petitioner in jail has neither been authorised by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate nor by the Sessions Judge as contemplated under S. 209 or under S. 309, Cr. P.C. which is mandatory provision of law. It is contended by the learned counsel that the order on the remand warrant and in the orde




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top