SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 959

NAGENDRA RAI, D.P.S.CHOUDHARY
Bihar Tourism Development Corp. – Appellant
Versus
Roy Construction & Co. – Respondent


Judgment

Nagendra Rai, J.

1. Both the appeals arise out of the same order and as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The appellant, Bihar Tourism Development Corporation (for short the Corporation) of L.P.A. No. 372 of 2000 and appellant Sunil Kumar Singh of L.P.A. No. 432 of 2000, who was Managing Director of the Corporation at the relevant time, have filed the present appeal against the order dated 3.2.2000, passed by a learned Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 2682 of 1999, by which he has directed the Corporation to pay the dues to the writ petitioner-respondent under the contract entered into between it and the appellant Corporation for construction of a cafeteria at Nalanda, together with interest @ 11% with effect from 15.9.1994 till the date of payment. The learned Single Judge has also ordered that cost of Rs. 25,000/- should be paid by appellant S. K. Singh, Managing Director and A. K. Singh, Manager (Administration) of the Corporation to the extent of half and half. He has further ordered that let the condemnation of this court be entered in the personal character tolls of the aforesaid two officials of the Corporation, who are gui






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top