SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 1258

RAVI S.DHAVAN, AFTAB ALAM
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Singh @ Bharat Rao – Respondent


Judgment

1. The State of Bihar has filed the present letters patent appeal challenging the order, dated 7.10.1999 passed in CWJC No. 6271 of 1998 (Bharat Singh @ Bharat Rao V/s. State of Bihar and Ors., 2001 (1) PLJR 641). The court has gone into the order and does not find anything incorrect in it so as to interfere by the present letters patent appeal. The order seems to be reasonable that the petitioner has virtually been made to retire by a declaration of the High Court reckoned from the year ending 1940. The petitioners request, that is, the date of birth be treated as in 1942 was denied. The petitioner was to superannuate on 30.6.1998. All that will happen is that now he will superannuate at the end of the year, 1998.

2. This is too petty a matter that the issue should be continued in a letters patent appeal. This appeal accordingly dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top