SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 1238

N.PANDEY, INDU PRABHA SINGH
Vinod Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Samastipur Kshetriya Gramin Bank – Respondent


Judgment

N.Pandey, J.

1. In this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the Order No. 2/88 dated 23.3.1988 as contained in Annexure 14, whereby and whereunder, Respondent Nos. 4 to 19 were promoted as Field Supervisors under the respondent-Bank. A prayer has also been made for a writ of mandamus commanding the Bank authorities to grant petitioners promotion against such posts strictly in accordance with Circular No. 23 dated 30.5.1986, as contained in Annexure 8 to the writ petition.

2. Petitioners and Respondent Nos. 4 to 19 were initially appointed under the respondent-Bank against various posts in the year 1981. Later, with a view to fill up the posts of Field Supervisors and Branch Managers in higher scale, Employment notices were published by the authorities by which certain percentage of Field Supervisors were required to be filled up on direct recruitment from the outside candidates and remaining posts by promotion. Initially on 7.1.1985, interview was held for filling up the posts on ad hoc basis because certain policy matters were still being finalised. Ultimately, on 27.5.1986, the Board of Directors approved and adopted the guidelines of the Bank as conta











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top