SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 1345

B.N.SINGH
S. W. Palanitkar And Others – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

B.N.Singh "Neelam", J.

1. This application under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code) is so filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 6.1.98 so passed in Complaint Case No. 1388/97 preferred by one Raghunath Prasad, figuring here as Opp. Party No. 2, in which the learned Court below, as detailed in the impugned order, a copy of which is filed, finding prime facie material has taken cognizance of the offence against the accused-petitioners under Secs. 406 and 420/120 B of the Indian Penal Code issuing summons against the petitioners under the provisions of Sec. 204 of the Code.

2. By going through the complaint, petition, a copy of which is filed marked as Annexure-1, in a nut shell the allegations so put against the present petitioners are that the accused-persons are concerned with M/s. Gujarat Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd., in short hereinafter to be referred as GSFC and Opp. Party No. 2 was so appointed as C & S (consignment Stockiest) as to get supply of their products i.e. urea in brand name "Sardar" and to that effect an agreement was also so entered into between the parties on 21.2.95, a copy of which is also available for perus







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top