SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 1028

R.M.PRASAD
Bhagawan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank – Respondent


Judgment

R.M.Prasad, J.

1. In this writ petition, petitioner is aggrieved by the order of his suspension passed on January 25, 1992 (Annexure 1) in contemplation of a departmental proceeding and also by order dated November 4, 1997 (Annexure-2) issued in modification of the aforementioned order continuing him under suspension pending criminal case/disciplinary proceedings contemplated against him.

2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the impugned order of suspension is fit to be quashed on the sole ground that it has now prolonged for over eight years. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in any view of the matter under paragraph 521 of the Shastri Award which also forms part of the Regulation of the respondent-Canara Bank, petitioner after completion of one year of his suspension is entitled for full pay and thus the respondents may be directed accordingly to pay full salary to the petitioner since after completion of one year of his suspension.

3. Mr. Chittaranjan Sinha, learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank has submitted that in view of the pendency of the criminal case which has been registered by the CBI, Patna against this pet











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top