SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 1076

S.N.PATHAK
Vagish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S.N.Pathak, J.

1. This criminal miscellaneous application has been filed seeking quashing of an order of cognizance dated 22.03.1997 passed by Shri Ved Prakash, Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in Complaint Case No. 541 of 1996.

2. The relevant facts for this miscellaneous case, as per the complaint petition of Raj Kishore Sharma, are to the effect that the complainant had married his daughter Sandhya Kumari on 21st May, 1986 to Vagish Kumar. After marriage, the complainants daughter went to her Sasural and at the time of marriage, several articles including ornaments, furniture, refrigerator etc. worth rupees 2,54,000/- were given to the husbands family. The complainants husbands family became annoyed with the inadequate supply of articles and they started cursing the complainants daughter for the aforesaid lapse on the part of her father. It was also alleged by the husbands family that Rs. 2,00,000/-, as promised, were not paid. The complainants daughter Sandhaya Kumar came back from her Sasural and then again on 28.05.1986, she was sent to her Sasural on second marriage (Gauna). She lived there for two months in the house of the husbands family and discharged all her matr






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top