SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 1080

NAGENDRA RAI, SHASHANK KR.SINGH
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 17.11.1999, passed by a learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 1236 of 1998, by which the writ application filed by the appellant challenging the notification dated 10.1.1998, issued under the order of the Governor of Bihar, terminating the services of the appellant as an Assistant Engineer, State Institute of Educational Technology (SIET), Bihar, Patna has been dismissed.

2. The facts, which are not in dispute, are as follows:

The aforesaid SIET was established in the year 1985 by the Government of India as an agency for utilising the INSAT 1B for educational purposes and qualitative development in education under the direct control of the State Government. Later on in 1991, the State Government took a decision to make the said SIET as an autonomous body and on 14.1.1994 the same has been made an autonomous body.

3. The appellant filed an application in 1988 before the Director, SCERT & SIET, Education Department, Government of Bihar, for his appointment as an Assistant Television Engineer vide Annexure 1 to the writ application, wherein he stated that he is an Engineering Graduate with first class degree from B.I.T., Mesra,












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top