SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 1089

R.M.PRASAD
Manju Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bihar State Housing Board – Respondent


Judgment

R.M.Prasad, J.

1. In this writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the demand contained in letter dated 23.12.1997 (Annexure 8), issued by the Revenue Officer of the Bihar State Housing Board, Patna to the Executive Engineer of the Board at Gaya, pursuant to which she is required to pay a further sum of Rs. 1,72,942.00 in addition to the amount which has already been paid by her as the price of M.I.G. House No. M.H. 13 at Gaya allotted to her.

2. In short, the relevant facts are that on 28.12.1976, the petitioner filed an application for allotment of M.I.G. house in pursuance of the advertisement. On 3.9.1983, lottery for the said purpose was held by the respondent Board and the petitioner was allotted the house in question, about which she received intimation, vide letter dated 3.9.1983, contained in Annexure 2. Pursuant to the said letter, she received the allotment letter dated 3.9.1983, contained in Annexure 3 also, whereby she was required to deposit a sum of Rs. 13,560.00 being 20% of the tentative price of the house and to deposit the remaining amount of Rs. 54,200.00 in 120 equal monthly instalments of Rs. 452.00 without interest and Rs. 502.00 with interest if











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top