SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 255

S.K.CHATTOPADHYAYA
Binod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

S.K.Chattopadhyaya, J.

1. In this writ application the petitioner has challenged the order of the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) an Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, Dhanbad, dated February 1, 1988, by reason of which he has directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 17094.00 towards claim of less payment and also awarded compensation to twenty one employees. The order dated December 8, 1988 has also been impugned by which the said Authority has refused to review his order.

2. The point, which is to be decided in this case is as to whether the Authority under the Minimum Wages Act has jurisdiction to entertain a claim for less payment of wages under Sec. 20(1) of Minimum Wages Act.

3. Respondent No, 2, Labour Enforcement Officer (Central), Gaya, exercising his power under Sec. 20(1) of the Minimum Wages Act complained to the Authority against the petitioner alleging, inter alia, that the petitioner has paid less than the minimum wages fixed for their categories of employment under the Act by Rs. 3.85, Rs. 5.85 per day and Rs. 4.85 per day, for the period from February 3, 1986 to March 8, 1986 as per statement enclosed with the complaint petition. The responden







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top