SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 661

NARAYAN ROY, S.N.PATHAK
Dago Hunda – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Narayan Roy, J.

1. Heard Counsel for the parties.

2. The sole appellant has been convicted under Secs. 302 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life under Sec. 302, I.P.C. and also to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000.00 and for default in payment of fine, he has been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. However, no separate sentence has been passed under Sec. 324 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, briefly stated, is that on 31.10.1989 at about it is hours P.W. 8 Manohar Prasad recorded the fardbeyan of the informant P.W. 5 Mangari Mundain where she stated that at about 5 p.m. on 30th October, 1989 while she was in her house, her mother was engaged in some work in the western lane (Gali) with her younger brother Samu Mundain in her lap arm. She heard a cry of her mother and no sooner she went near her mother, she found her mother and her younger brother aged about one year lying on the ground and there the appellant Dago Munda was seen assaulting her mother and brother with a farsa. When she questioned the appellant, she was chased and was assaulted with farsa on her left arm and out of fear, she went i

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top