SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 765

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Md. Muslim Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S.J.Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. The petitioner has challenged the order, contained in Memo No. 406 dated 25th August, 1998, passed by the Special Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar in an appeal-petition preferred by Respondent No. 6, Md. Ishaque. By the impugned order, while the Managing Committee, which appointed the petitioner, has been held to be illegally constituted, the appointment of petitioner has been held to be illegal on such ground. The authority also upheld the appointment of Respondent No. 6, Md. Ishaque.

2. It appears that six units were sanctioned by the State of Bihar in 1981 for the Madarsa with Junior Section, namely, (i) Fazil-1 post; (ii) Alim-1 post; (iii) Moulvi-1 post; (iv) Hafiz-1 post; (v) I.A. Trained-1 post; and (vi) Matric trained-1 post. On the basis of a certificate of Fazil Nizami, the 6th Respondent was given appointment in 1977 against the post of Alim.

3. It appears that before approval of the appointment by the Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, certain infirmities, in the matter of appointment of 6th Respondent came to its notice, which by its letter dated 30th October, 1981 directed the S.D.E.O. concerned to make inquiry. The












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top