SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 513

R.M.PRASAD
Bidya Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. The petitioner is the widow of Late Bhagat Prasad, who sought voluntary retirement on 1.5.1993 while working as Headmaster, Government Middle School, Laxmipur Laukhan, Anchal Ghorsahan, in the district of East Champaran and ultimately died on 30th October, 1997.

2. It is stated that the husband of the petitioner made all efforts to persuade the respondent-authorities to make payment of his provident fund dues, but the respondents-authorities have not paid the same to her husband while he was alive or to the petitioner, which compelled her to file the present writ petition.

3. The petitioner claims to be the nominee of her deceased husband and is entitled to receive the provident fund amount.

4. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Provident Fund Officer, Motihari (respondent no. 5) in which it is stated that the District superintendent of Education, Motihari has not sent application for final withdrawal to this respondent.

It is further stated that a letter was sent to the District Superintendent of Education for sending application for final withdrawal and balance up to 1985- 86. The said respondent has, thus, shown helplessness in authorising the amount















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top