SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Pat) 940

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD, SACHCHIDANAND JHA
Punya Mani Devi And Others – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Sachchidanand Jha, J.

1. The dispute in this Letters Patent Appeal relates to the validity of a gift in the context of Sec. 5 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 (in short the Consolidation Act). The dispute has arisen out of orders passed in a proceeding relating to preparation of register of land under Sec. 10 (2) of the Consolidation Act. The appellants had succeeded before the original authority i.e. the Consolidation Officer but lost before the appellate and revisional authorities. He approached this Court for setting aside those orders in the connected case i.e. C.W.J.C. No. 607 of 1985 but without success.

2. From the order of the learned Single Judge it appears that the only point urged before him was that as the notification under Sec. 3 of the Consolidation Act had been rescinded by the State Government with respect to area comprising Improvement Trust or Blocks the question of obtaining sanction under Sec. 5 of the Act did not arise. The learned Judge noticed the notification referred to in support of the contention and observed that perusal of the notification merely shows that the areas falling under the Improvement
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top