SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Pat) 934

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD, S.N.JHA
Ramjanam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. This Letters Patent Appeal arises from the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing the writ petition of the appellant. The writ petition has arisen from an order of the Collector, Vaishali by which the deed of gift executed by Basmati Devi in favour of Smt. Chandri Devi was held to be void under section 32 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 (in short, the Act).

2. The short facts of the case are that the said Basmati Devi executed the impugned deed of gift in favour of her daughter-in-law, Smt. Chandri Devi, in respect of 2.63 acres of lands on 3rd August, 1976. The validity of the gift was challenged on the ground that the donor had not obtained prior permission of the Consolidation Officer in terms of section 5 of the said Act. Section 5 of the Act prohibits certain types of transfer without prior sanction.. Section 6 lays down the procedure for obtaining the sanction. Section 32 of the Act provides that the transfer of any land or fragment contrary to the provisions of this Act shall be void; and the owner of any land, so transferred shall be liable to pay fine, not exceeding two hundred and fifty rupee











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top