SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Pat) 928

P.K.DEB
Shakti Nath Jha – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Judgment

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred against the order dated 27.6.1998 as contained in Annexure-3 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Saharsa in Misc. Case No. 149/1998 and also the order dated 20.1.2000 (Annexure-4) passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Saharsa in Cr. Revision No. 534 of 1998. The grievance of the petitioner is that the whole matter is in seisin of the civil court. There is no jurisdiction of the Executive Court to enter into any dispute regarding the measurement of the plot of land. Admittedly the petitioner alongwith others had filed Title Suit No. 35/1990 in the court of Munsif, Saharsa with a relief for declaration of their title over Plot No. 7369 measuring 1 Katha 10 Dhoors. The defendant of the suit contested and asserted that the disputed plot does not measure 1 Katha 10 Dhoors rather it measured 1 Katha 14 Dhoors. A pleader commissioner was appointed during the course of trial of the suit and on the basis of such Advocate Commissioners report and also by considering the case of both the parties the suit was decreed. Then an appeal was preferred by the defendant in Title Appeal No. 2 of 1996

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top