SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Pat) 25

P.K.DEB
Jogendra Prasad Alias Bhola – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Kumar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard both parties.

2. This revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 30-9-1999 passed by the Addl. District Judge X, Patna in Probate Case No.119 of 1992 whereby on the death of executor who filed a probate case, his-son who happens also a legatee of the deceased Will maker had filed a petition for his substitution and to proceed with the probate case has been allowed. On subsequent occasion it is stated at the Bar that a petition had also been filed by the legatee for grant of letters of administration on the basis of the Will.

3. Learned Senior Counsel for and on behalf of the petitioners has challenged the impugned order on the ground that in a probate case which had been filed by an executor, the same cannot be changed to a case of letters of administration and, in that respect he has referred to a Division fiench decision of this Court but it appears from that judgment that S.232 of the Indian Succession Act had never been taken into consideration. In that provision even a probate case being filed before the Will being proved, if the executor dies then the Court can pass an order for letters of administration. Even under that Section no question

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top